Fastest LLMs: Latency Benchmarks Compared
Time to first token and tokens per second compared across major AI providers. Which models are fast enough for real-time applications?
Key Takeaways
| Takeaway | Details |
|---|---|
| Speed Leaders | Groq achieves 500-800 tokens per second on Llama 3.1 70B, five to ten times faster than GPU inference. |
| Frontier Models | Gemini 2.5 Flash delivers under 500ms TTFT and 100-plus TPS as the fastest large capable model. |
| Streaming Benefits | Streaming reduces perceived latency by three to five times even when total generation time is identical. |
| Voice AI Recommendations | Use Groq with Llama 3.3 70B or Gemini 2.5 Flash for lowest latency voice applications. |
| Regional Testing | Test latency from your deployment region as infrastructure geography significantly affects TTFT. |
Why Speed Matters
For conversational AI, voice interfaces, and real-time coding assistants, latency is not a nice-to-have. It is a core product requirement. Users start feeling friction when responses take more than one to two seconds to begin, and abandon workflows when generation is slow enough to disrupt their thinking.
Two metrics matter: Time to First Token (TTFT), which measures how long until text starts appearing, and tokens per second (TPS), which measures how fast text streams after it begins. TTFT dominates perceived responsiveness. TPS determines how long users wait for long responses.
Speed Rankings
Groq leads on raw speed for smaller models, achieving 500 to 800 tokens per second on Llama 3.1 70B using custom LPU hardware. This is five to ten times faster than GPU inference. For small models where speed is everything, Groq's API is unmatched. Cerebras offers similar performance on Llama variants.
Among frontier model providers, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the fastest large capable model, typically delivering under 500ms TTFT and 100-plus TPS. Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-4o Mini are close competitors. Claude Opus 4 and GPT-5 are the slowest frontier models due to their size.
Streaming vs. Non-Streaming
All major providers support streaming responses, which dramatically improves perceived responsiveness. With streaming, users see tokens as they are generated rather than waiting for the complete response. For conversational UIs, always enable streaming. It reduces perceived latency by three to five times even when total generation time is identical.
Reasoning models have inherently higher TTFT because they think before responding. Users see no output during the thinking phase, making them feel slower than standard models. Some providers expose thinking progress indicators to mitigate this.
Speed Recommendations
Voice AI: Use Groq with Llama 3.3 70B or Gemini 2.5 Flash for the lowest latency. Real-time coding autocomplete: GPT-4o Mini or Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite. Customer support chatbot: Claude 3.5 Haiku or GPT-4o Mini, both offering sub-second TTFT. Long-form generation where speed matters less: Claude Sonnet or GPT-4o are fine.
Test latency from your deployment region, as infrastructure geography significantly affects TTFT. A model that is fastest in the US may not be fastest for European or Asian users. Most providers offer regional endpoints or have global infrastructure.
Read next
Tokens Per Second: Measuring LLM Generation Speed
What tokens per second (TPS) measures, how it affects real-world AI applications, which models are fastest, and how to interpret speed vs. quality tradeoffs.
Time to First Token (TTFT): The Most Important Latency Metric
Why time to first token defines perceived AI responsiveness, what drives TTFT differences between models and providers, and how to optimize for low-latency applications.
Cheapest LLMs That Actually Deliver in 2025
Cost-effective AI models that don't compromise on quality. The best picks for budget-conscious developers and high-volume production applications.
