blog·8 min read

Llama 4: Everything You Need to Know

By Keimodel Team·

Meta's Llama 4 family brings MoE architecture, native multimodality, and a 10M-token context window to open-weight AI. Here's the full breakdown.

Key Takeaways

TakeawayDetails
MoE ArchitectureLlama 4 adopts Mixture of Experts architecture, departing from Llama 3's dense transformer design.
10M Context WindowScout model offers the largest context window of any openly available model at 10 million tokens.
Competitive PerformanceMaverick achieves 85.5% MMLU, 88.0% HumanEval, and 84.7% Math, competing with GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
Commercial LicenseLlama 4 Community License permits commercial use except for companies with over 700 million monthly active users.
Native MultimodalityMaverick processes vision and text natively from training rather than as an add-on capability.
Self-Hosting OptionQuantized Maverick runs on four A100 GPUs, eliminating per-token costs for organizations with scale.

What Is Llama 4?

Llama 4 is Meta AI's fourth generation of open-weight large language models, released in April 2025. It represents a significant architectural leap from Llama 3. Where Llama 3 used a dense transformer, Llama 4 adopts Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture and adds native multimodal capabilities.

The Llama 4 family consists of three models: Scout (the efficient option with a 10M context window), Maverick (the flagship multimodal model), and Behemoth (the largest, most capable model, released under the Llama 4 Community License for most uses).

Llama 4 Scout: The Long Context Marvel

Scout is the most technically remarkable member of the family. Its 10 million-token context window is the largest of any openly available model. It enables processing entire large codebases, books, or years of conversation history in a single prompt. It uses a 16-expert MoE architecture that makes it surprisingly efficient for its capability level.

At $0.05/$0.17 per million tokens, Scout represents extraordinary value for long-document analysis, multi-file code understanding, and large-scale RAG applications. Its main limitation is that very long contexts can exhibit the 'lost in the middle' problem for retrieval-heavy tasks.

Llama 4 Maverick: The Open Frontier

Maverick uses 128 experts and processes up to 1M tokens. It competes credibly with GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet across most benchmarks, a remarkable achievement for an open-weight model. MMLU: 85.5%, HumanEval: 88.0%, Math: 84.7%. It is natively multimodal, enabling vision and text understanding from training rather than as a bolt-on.

Being open-weight means Maverick can be fine-tuned, quantized, and self-hosted. For organizations that need frontier-quality performance with data sovereignty, Maverick is the strongest option currently available. It has already spawned dozens of fine-tuned variants on Hugging Face within weeks of release.

The Llama 4 License

Llama 4 is released under the Llama 4 Community License, which permits commercial use for most organizations. The key restriction: companies with over 700 million monthly active users must contact Meta directly for a license. Competing AI service providers are also restricted from using Llama 4 as a backend without permission.

For the vast majority of developers and organizations, the license is effectively permissive. You can fine-tune, deploy, and build products on top of Llama 4 without royalties. This makes Llama 4 viable for serious commercial applications.

Llama 4 vs Closed Models: How Does It Stack Up?

Maverick is genuinely competitive with GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet on most tasks, with some meaningful gaps. Llama 4 is weaker on complex multi-step reasoning, non-English languages, and precise instruction-following at the tail. For 70 to 80 percent of real-world tasks, the difference is negligible.

The open-weight advantage is real. Self-hosted Maverick with 4-bit quantization runs on four A100 GPUs and eliminates per-token costs. Organizations with significant scale and sensitivity requirements will find this equation compelling. The tradeoff is infrastructure complexity and the absence of OpenAI and Anthropic-level safety filtering.

metallamaopen-weightmoemultimodalcomparisons